'I'm the Phil Ivey of Craps!' Hi fives all around which did not amuse all those walking by who did not understand why the Phil Ivey of craps wanted a high five from them. He comes back to the table to pick up his winnings, looks at the dealer and says I should get paid twice. Dealer says 'you did $36 dollars right there'. Phil Ivey on Bilzerian Rumor, Craps and Early Days Thursday, March 13th, 2014 Often billed as the world's best poker player, Phil Ivey has kept a low profile throughout most of his career. Apr 26, 2006 The guy behind us overheard and said that Ivey was up all night playing craps and he won over $1 million, so he bought in to the tourney right after and went up to his room to take a nap. Didn't seem to affect his stack too much cause he looked to be chip leader at his table when we spotted him. Each child was given $100 and competed in roulette, baccarat, and craps with Ivey. Ivey has also founded two companies. Ivey Poker, established in 2012 offers a 'play for free' poker App that allows users to compete against Ivey and other pros. 50 Ivey League was a poker training site with a full roster of professional coaches launched in 2014.
The ten-time World Series of Poker bracelet winner was ordered to return his massive winnings, but the casino's lawyers keep coming up empty-handed.
Get a compelling long read and must-have lifestyle tips in your inbox every Sunday morning — great with coffee!
Left: The Borgata in Atlantic City. (AP Photo). Right: Poker star Phil Ivey. (AP Photo).
Phil Ivey is, without a doubt, one of the most recognizable poker players in the world. Ivey, who has said he's the Michael Jordan and Tiger Woods of poker, has won ten World Series of Poker bracelets. His winnings at live tournaments reportedly exceed $25 million, and that's not counting all of the money he's won playing online or just walking into a casino and putting his cash on the table. But one casino that Ivey might want to think twice before walking into again is the Borgata in Atlantic City.
The Borgata has been chasing after Ivey, who is 42, for more than $10 million after a judge ruled that Ivey didn't play by the rules when he won millions at the casino.
Lawyers representing the Borgata have been unsuccessful in tracking down Ivey's assets in New Jersey, where he has lived over the years, and now a federal judge decided just last week that the Borgata can go after Ivey in Nevada, where he is believed to have significant assets. Ivey was scheduled to appear in New Jersey for a deposition on Thursday, January 31st.
It all goes back to 2012, when Ivey showed up at the Borgata to play not poker but baccarat, which, thanks to being absolutely huge overseas, is the world's most popular gambling game.
Unlike poker, baccarat is completely a game of luck — well, unless you figure out a way to identify some of the cards in the deck. And that is exactly the scheme that Ivey employed with the help of a friend, who accompanied him to the Borgata's baccarat tables.
That friend is Cheung Yin Sun, whose nickname is 'The Baccarat Machine,' according to this profile in Cigar Aficionado.
Sun spent countless hours memorizing certain flaws in decks made by the card manufacturing company Gemaco that allowed her to determine what some of the cards were, tilting the odds in Ivey's favor. It's a technique known as edge-sorting.
Between April 2012 and October 2012, Ivey won more than $9.6 million playing baccarat at the Borgata with Sun's edge-sorting help. During one 17-hour period in July of that year alone, Ivey walked away with $4.8 million in winnings.
The Borgata filed suit against Ivey, Sun, and the card manufacturer way back in 2014, demanding that Ivey return $10.1 million he took from the casino, which included the $9.6 million in baccarat winnings plus another $500,000 he won at the craps table, using the baccarat winnings as his stake.
Eventually, the judge decided that what Ivey and Sun had done didn't constitute fraud, but the judge ruled that the pair's edge-sorting scheme did amount to a violation of New Jersey's Casino Control Act. And so the Borgata would be able to get its money back. At some point.
Ivey also got into trouble with London's exclusive Crockfords casino for edge-sorting.
At Crockfords, also in 2012, Ivey edge-sorted to the tune of $10.2 million playing baccarat. Once the casino caught on to his scheme, they refused to pay him. Ivey sued them — later conceding that he had used edge-sorting but arguing that there was nothing wrong with that — but the court ruled in favor of the casino.
Ivey appealed the Crockfords matter all the way up to England's Supreme Court. But in 2017, the five-judge panel told him to take a hike.
'This game is one of pure chance, with cards delivered entirely at random and unknowable by the [player] or the house,' read the opinion. 'What Mr. Ivey did was to stage a carefully planned and executed sting.'
As for Gemaco's role in the matter, a judge humorously decided that the most the Borgata could collect from the company would be $27 — the cost of the cards it had purchased.
Ivey's attorneys did not respond by deadline for a comment on this story. A spokesperson for the Borgata says that the casino does not comment on ongoing litigation.
Gambling is a great form of entertainment whether online or land-based, and sees many fortunate souls claiming big prizes with little risk. However, the world of professional gambling is not for the faint of heart, and holds much bigger probabilities for loss, especially for gambling greats like poker pro Phil Ivey.
For those of you not in the know, Ivey is a stand out poker player and card expert much like the late Stu Ungar or the legendary Amarillo Slim. Ivey has managed to win ten World Series of Poker bracelets throughout his illustrious career, taking home major pots against top competition in the world of professional poker.
However, last year, poker-great Ivey saw no tournament action in the U.S., largely due to a lengthy, years-long gambling scandal that first made headlines back in 2012. Although poker is Ivey's forte, ironically, the scandal in question does not involve poker at all, but the game of baccarat. The repercussions of the lengthy case has made waves throughout the gambling community begging the question 'is Phil Ivey the best card player in the world or just a cheat?' For the young poker tour de force, it is not just his money at stake, but his gambling reputation. Planet 7 Online casino has the scoop on the infamous Phil Ivey case.
Cards to Cabo
Growing up in the working class town of Roselle, New Jersey, Ivey learned poker from his grandfather at the local barbershop. As a young man, he worked at the local McDonald's and garnered the courage to obtain a fake ID so that he could make the nearly two hour drive from his hometown to play at the poker tables of America's playground, Atlantic City. Today, Ivey plays poker almost daily, prepping for the grueling 14-hour day marathon sessions at the seven-day WSOP tournament, which takes place each year in Las Vegas.
Known for possessing near clairvoyant card playing abilities and impossible to read tells at the poker tables – Phil Ivey has earned over $23 million in professional winnings from playing poker. He is arguably the best player in the world, with a penchant for taking risks on and off the casino floor. Ivey gambles on everything from World Cup football tournaments at $500,000 a game, to hustling basketball legends like Michael Jordan on the golf course for par, participating in various side bets at the casinos, and as an avid sports nut, participating in sports betting. He owns homes in Las Vegas, Cabo San Lucas and Macau, and has an estimated net worth of $100 million from gambling and endorsements. However, our story begins back in New Jersey in Atlantic City, where the man who claims that there is no risk big enough may have bit off more than he could chew.
Scandal at the casino tables
The game of baccarat made famous to mainstream audiences as James Bond's card game of choice, can be found throughout various casinos and gambling halls of the world. Although it still holds an element of posh and mystique, modest versions of the game exist among the casino floors of Vegas and Macau among the large gambling destinations. The scandal in question however pertains to not one, but two high-end casinos, the Borgata in Atlantic City and Crockfords in the chic Mayfair district of London.
Over a four-month period in 2012, Ivey came under fire after he won over $20 million from the luxury casinos playing Punto Banco baccarat. Punto Banco is a variant of baccarat that holds one of the lowest house edges of any game in the casino at 0.8%. It requires no skill to play, and relies on determining if the winning hand will belong to the dealer (banker), the player, or if the two hands will result in a tie. The object of baccarat is to predict which hand will add up closest to nine based on a point system. In baccarat, a player cannot go over the maximum number of points, or 'bust', like in blackjack.
Outrage began when the two casinos accused Ivey of a technique known as 'edge sorting'. Edge sorting involves reading tiny patterns along the edges of imperfectly cut playing cards in order to predict their value before they are turned. It is extraordinarily method to master, but Ivey was up for a challenge.
What makes the case interesting is that Ivey admitted to having performed edge sorting, claiming that the tactic is simply a legal form of advantage play, and does not constitute cheating or illegal activity. Experts claim that edge sorting utilized by Ivey gave him a 5-6% edge over the house, which resulted in him walking away with $9.6 million from Borgata over a four-month period, and over two days in London, winning $10.1 million from Crockfords. The latter refused to pay Ivey his winnings, and by 2014, a lengthy legal battle ensued against Ivey by both casinos.
Poker high roller
According to Ivey himself, he used his position as a high roller and premium player to have certain requests granted to him by the casinos in question. Casinos depend on bigtime players like him to stay afloat, because of the massive potential for financial gain. In order to entice such VIPs to play at their establishments, casinos will offer incentives to premium players, from complementary room and board, transportation and entertainment, to anything else a VIP may request, in exchange that the individual gamble a predetermined amount on the casino floors.
Daniel Negreanu
After wiring advances of $3 million and £1 million to Borgata and Crockfords respectively, Ivey's requests included that the casinos use a particular brand of playing cards and shuffle machine for his games, as well as Asian dealers. Ivey states that the casinos agreed to his every request, forming a ‘verbal contractual agreement', which allowed him to gain the upper hand.
In addition, Ivey did not act alone, and had an accomplice by the name of Cheng Yin Sun, who has been involved in edge sorting scams in the past and has even been banned from some U.S. casinos. She and Ivey placed massive bets and utilized advantage play to take the house, never physically touching the cards to alter the elements of chance, but encouraging dealers to perform moves in their favor unknowingly. Their strategy successfully exploited the weaknesses of the house and ended up costing the venues millions.
To complicate matters, many game protection experts agree that Ivey did not do anything illegal, not having cheated by marking cards or altering wagers such as 'past posting' for instance. Ivey simply outsmarted the dealers by claiming superstition, in order to achieve his desired result. Although edge sorting is legal, much like card counting it is heavily discouraged by casinos. Once the lawsuits emerged, the legal system was put into play, and although Ivey was never arrested or formally charged with anything, the casinos cried foul play; accusing him of cheating, and dishonesty. Phil Ivey claimed that he had done nothing wrong, but his accusers begged to differ.
The Ivey Case
The courts of the U.S. and England knew that they were dealing with an unprecedented case. If Ivey had not physically altered the cards and the casinos had agreed to the terms listed beforehand, what constituted as cheating, the mere fact that Ivey had been dishonest?
Prosecutors described the Ivey case as one of the most significant in criminal legislation for a generation. Ivey countersued, arguing that his honor and reputation as a gambler was at stake, adding that sting of 'cheater' next to his name would be detrimental to his status as a professional player; and demanded that he receive his winnings. The various media outlets covered the Ivey case, and was even a feature on the popular television news show '60 Minutes'.
The outcome? Ivey was ordered to pay back the $9.6 million in winnings to Borgata casino after a New Jersey court ruled in the casino's favor; and after years of lengthy trial proceedings in England, the UK High Court ruled that Ivey had cheated Crockfords casino. Crockfords casino did not owe the £7.7 million ($10.1 million) in winnings to Ivey.
There was no doubt in the UK court's mind that the actions of Ivey and Sun interfered with the process of the game, which was enough to constitute foul play; adding, 'What Mr. Ivey did was to stage a carefully planned and executed sting'. U.S. District Judge Noel Hillman ruled that Ivey and his partner did not commit fraud, but had breached their contract with the Borgata casino, which was grounds to forfeit their winnings.
Consequently, Borgata casino sued the Missouri-based card company Gemaco, responsible for manufacturing the cards. Borgata claimed that the company's faulty cards led to millions of dollars in losses for the casino. Unfortunately, for Borgata, the New Jersey courts ruled that Gemaco was not accountable for the losses, and would only have to reimburse the casino $27 for the faulty deck of cards used during a particular baccarat game. It was not the last anyone would hear from Ivey however.
A gambling legacy
The irony of the case is that most professional gamblers and game protection experts such as Jim Hartley agree that Ivey merely outwitted the casinos, beating them at their own game, and making them look bad. In an industry where the land-based casinos are out to get players' money, here was an instance of a card pro that had overcome those odds and was rubbing their noses in it.
Ivey himself has argued repeatedly that his legacy as a professional player is at stake. In a profession that relies on reputation, the worst thing for him was that the courts in both instances ruled against him in favor of the casinos. With a steady game face, he refuses to go down without a fight, and knows this is one gamble he cannot afford to lose. As for the tables, in 2017, Ivey returned to what he does best by frequenting the numerous high stakes poker tournaments of Macau. He also stated publicly that he would return to WSOP for 2018. In regards to the Borgata ruling, Ivey appealed the New Jersey court's decision regarding the $9.6 million he must pay back. The case remains open to this day.
Phil Ivey Lawsuit Update
Sun spent countless hours memorizing certain flaws in decks made by the card manufacturing company Gemaco that allowed her to determine what some of the cards were, tilting the odds in Ivey's favor. It's a technique known as edge-sorting.
Between April 2012 and October 2012, Ivey won more than $9.6 million playing baccarat at the Borgata with Sun's edge-sorting help. During one 17-hour period in July of that year alone, Ivey walked away with $4.8 million in winnings.
The Borgata filed suit against Ivey, Sun, and the card manufacturer way back in 2014, demanding that Ivey return $10.1 million he took from the casino, which included the $9.6 million in baccarat winnings plus another $500,000 he won at the craps table, using the baccarat winnings as his stake.
Eventually, the judge decided that what Ivey and Sun had done didn't constitute fraud, but the judge ruled that the pair's edge-sorting scheme did amount to a violation of New Jersey's Casino Control Act. And so the Borgata would be able to get its money back. At some point.
Ivey also got into trouble with London's exclusive Crockfords casino for edge-sorting.
At Crockfords, also in 2012, Ivey edge-sorted to the tune of $10.2 million playing baccarat. Once the casino caught on to his scheme, they refused to pay him. Ivey sued them — later conceding that he had used edge-sorting but arguing that there was nothing wrong with that — but the court ruled in favor of the casino.
Ivey appealed the Crockfords matter all the way up to England's Supreme Court. But in 2017, the five-judge panel told him to take a hike.
'This game is one of pure chance, with cards delivered entirely at random and unknowable by the [player] or the house,' read the opinion. 'What Mr. Ivey did was to stage a carefully planned and executed sting.'
As for Gemaco's role in the matter, a judge humorously decided that the most the Borgata could collect from the company would be $27 — the cost of the cards it had purchased.
Ivey's attorneys did not respond by deadline for a comment on this story. A spokesperson for the Borgata says that the casino does not comment on ongoing litigation.
Gambling is a great form of entertainment whether online or land-based, and sees many fortunate souls claiming big prizes with little risk. However, the world of professional gambling is not for the faint of heart, and holds much bigger probabilities for loss, especially for gambling greats like poker pro Phil Ivey.
For those of you not in the know, Ivey is a stand out poker player and card expert much like the late Stu Ungar or the legendary Amarillo Slim. Ivey has managed to win ten World Series of Poker bracelets throughout his illustrious career, taking home major pots against top competition in the world of professional poker.
However, last year, poker-great Ivey saw no tournament action in the U.S., largely due to a lengthy, years-long gambling scandal that first made headlines back in 2012. Although poker is Ivey's forte, ironically, the scandal in question does not involve poker at all, but the game of baccarat. The repercussions of the lengthy case has made waves throughout the gambling community begging the question 'is Phil Ivey the best card player in the world or just a cheat?' For the young poker tour de force, it is not just his money at stake, but his gambling reputation. Planet 7 Online casino has the scoop on the infamous Phil Ivey case.
Cards to Cabo
Growing up in the working class town of Roselle, New Jersey, Ivey learned poker from his grandfather at the local barbershop. As a young man, he worked at the local McDonald's and garnered the courage to obtain a fake ID so that he could make the nearly two hour drive from his hometown to play at the poker tables of America's playground, Atlantic City. Today, Ivey plays poker almost daily, prepping for the grueling 14-hour day marathon sessions at the seven-day WSOP tournament, which takes place each year in Las Vegas.
Known for possessing near clairvoyant card playing abilities and impossible to read tells at the poker tables – Phil Ivey has earned over $23 million in professional winnings from playing poker. He is arguably the best player in the world, with a penchant for taking risks on and off the casino floor. Ivey gambles on everything from World Cup football tournaments at $500,000 a game, to hustling basketball legends like Michael Jordan on the golf course for par, participating in various side bets at the casinos, and as an avid sports nut, participating in sports betting. He owns homes in Las Vegas, Cabo San Lucas and Macau, and has an estimated net worth of $100 million from gambling and endorsements. However, our story begins back in New Jersey in Atlantic City, where the man who claims that there is no risk big enough may have bit off more than he could chew.
Scandal at the casino tables
The game of baccarat made famous to mainstream audiences as James Bond's card game of choice, can be found throughout various casinos and gambling halls of the world. Although it still holds an element of posh and mystique, modest versions of the game exist among the casino floors of Vegas and Macau among the large gambling destinations. The scandal in question however pertains to not one, but two high-end casinos, the Borgata in Atlantic City and Crockfords in the chic Mayfair district of London.
Over a four-month period in 2012, Ivey came under fire after he won over $20 million from the luxury casinos playing Punto Banco baccarat. Punto Banco is a variant of baccarat that holds one of the lowest house edges of any game in the casino at 0.8%. It requires no skill to play, and relies on determining if the winning hand will belong to the dealer (banker), the player, or if the two hands will result in a tie. The object of baccarat is to predict which hand will add up closest to nine based on a point system. In baccarat, a player cannot go over the maximum number of points, or 'bust', like in blackjack.
Outrage began when the two casinos accused Ivey of a technique known as 'edge sorting'. Edge sorting involves reading tiny patterns along the edges of imperfectly cut playing cards in order to predict their value before they are turned. It is extraordinarily method to master, but Ivey was up for a challenge.
What makes the case interesting is that Ivey admitted to having performed edge sorting, claiming that the tactic is simply a legal form of advantage play, and does not constitute cheating or illegal activity. Experts claim that edge sorting utilized by Ivey gave him a 5-6% edge over the house, which resulted in him walking away with $9.6 million from Borgata over a four-month period, and over two days in London, winning $10.1 million from Crockfords. The latter refused to pay Ivey his winnings, and by 2014, a lengthy legal battle ensued against Ivey by both casinos.
Poker high roller
According to Ivey himself, he used his position as a high roller and premium player to have certain requests granted to him by the casinos in question. Casinos depend on bigtime players like him to stay afloat, because of the massive potential for financial gain. In order to entice such VIPs to play at their establishments, casinos will offer incentives to premium players, from complementary room and board, transportation and entertainment, to anything else a VIP may request, in exchange that the individual gamble a predetermined amount on the casino floors.
Daniel Negreanu
After wiring advances of $3 million and £1 million to Borgata and Crockfords respectively, Ivey's requests included that the casinos use a particular brand of playing cards and shuffle machine for his games, as well as Asian dealers. Ivey states that the casinos agreed to his every request, forming a ‘verbal contractual agreement', which allowed him to gain the upper hand.
In addition, Ivey did not act alone, and had an accomplice by the name of Cheng Yin Sun, who has been involved in edge sorting scams in the past and has even been banned from some U.S. casinos. She and Ivey placed massive bets and utilized advantage play to take the house, never physically touching the cards to alter the elements of chance, but encouraging dealers to perform moves in their favor unknowingly. Their strategy successfully exploited the weaknesses of the house and ended up costing the venues millions.
To complicate matters, many game protection experts agree that Ivey did not do anything illegal, not having cheated by marking cards or altering wagers such as 'past posting' for instance. Ivey simply outsmarted the dealers by claiming superstition, in order to achieve his desired result. Although edge sorting is legal, much like card counting it is heavily discouraged by casinos. Once the lawsuits emerged, the legal system was put into play, and although Ivey was never arrested or formally charged with anything, the casinos cried foul play; accusing him of cheating, and dishonesty. Phil Ivey claimed that he had done nothing wrong, but his accusers begged to differ.
The Ivey Case
The courts of the U.S. and England knew that they were dealing with an unprecedented case. If Ivey had not physically altered the cards and the casinos had agreed to the terms listed beforehand, what constituted as cheating, the mere fact that Ivey had been dishonest?
Prosecutors described the Ivey case as one of the most significant in criminal legislation for a generation. Ivey countersued, arguing that his honor and reputation as a gambler was at stake, adding that sting of 'cheater' next to his name would be detrimental to his status as a professional player; and demanded that he receive his winnings. The various media outlets covered the Ivey case, and was even a feature on the popular television news show '60 Minutes'.
The outcome? Ivey was ordered to pay back the $9.6 million in winnings to Borgata casino after a New Jersey court ruled in the casino's favor; and after years of lengthy trial proceedings in England, the UK High Court ruled that Ivey had cheated Crockfords casino. Crockfords casino did not owe the £7.7 million ($10.1 million) in winnings to Ivey.
There was no doubt in the UK court's mind that the actions of Ivey and Sun interfered with the process of the game, which was enough to constitute foul play; adding, 'What Mr. Ivey did was to stage a carefully planned and executed sting'. U.S. District Judge Noel Hillman ruled that Ivey and his partner did not commit fraud, but had breached their contract with the Borgata casino, which was grounds to forfeit their winnings.
Consequently, Borgata casino sued the Missouri-based card company Gemaco, responsible for manufacturing the cards. Borgata claimed that the company's faulty cards led to millions of dollars in losses for the casino. Unfortunately, for Borgata, the New Jersey courts ruled that Gemaco was not accountable for the losses, and would only have to reimburse the casino $27 for the faulty deck of cards used during a particular baccarat game. It was not the last anyone would hear from Ivey however.
A gambling legacy
The irony of the case is that most professional gamblers and game protection experts such as Jim Hartley agree that Ivey merely outwitted the casinos, beating them at their own game, and making them look bad. In an industry where the land-based casinos are out to get players' money, here was an instance of a card pro that had overcome those odds and was rubbing their noses in it.
Ivey himself has argued repeatedly that his legacy as a professional player is at stake. In a profession that relies on reputation, the worst thing for him was that the courts in both instances ruled against him in favor of the casinos. With a steady game face, he refuses to go down without a fight, and knows this is one gamble he cannot afford to lose. As for the tables, in 2017, Ivey returned to what he does best by frequenting the numerous high stakes poker tournaments of Macau. He also stated publicly that he would return to WSOP for 2018. In regards to the Borgata ruling, Ivey appealed the New Jersey court's decision regarding the $9.6 million he must pay back. The case remains open to this day.
Phil Ivey Lawsuit Update
Do you feel like you have the stuff to gamble like the legendary Phil Ivey? Whether or not you possess a few tricks up your sleeve or not, you can enjoy all of the advantages of poker at Planet 7 Online Casino. Planet 7 offers a plethora of exciting table and specialty games, and an immersive selection of slots games, rewarding bonuses, and weekly promotions. Choose to play instantly free by registering for a personal gaming account or play for real money by signing up with a minimum deposit using secure payment options. Blast off to Planet 7 Online Casino, the perfect way to play.
